Security and verification
Security and verification for litigation work.
LitiGenie is built to keep case materials controlled, source-backed, and attorney-reviewed. Firms can review data handling, model-provider terms, retention expectations, and current controls before uploading real case files.
Published security baseline
What firms can confirm before uploading case files.
No training on customer documents
LitiGenie does not use uploaded documents to train AI models.
Encrypted transmission
Documents and requests are transmitted over HTTPS/TLS.
Authenticated access
Access is controlled through authenticated accounts and case or organization permissions.
API-based model processing
Some workflows send document excerpts or extracted text to Anthropic through API-based processing.
Deletion requests
Supported documents and outputs can be deleted where controls are available; account-data deletion requests are processed within 30 days, subject to legal or operational retention needs.
Current posture
Clear answers matter before a firm pilot.
Law firms need plain-language answers about access, file handling, source verification, and attorney review before using legal AI on client matters.
Authenticated workspace
LitiGenie is built around authenticated accounts and case workspaces, not public document links.
Encrypted transmission
Production access is designed around HTTPS/TLS for app access, API requests, and document transfer paths.
Customer case materials
Security review can cover file handling, retention expectations, deletion requests, and model-provider terms before a firm pilot.
Case-scoped review
The product experience is organized around the case file so source materials, findings, and work product stay tied to the matter.
AI and verification
Source-backed output is a review model, not a substitute for legal judgment.
LitiGenie makes it easier to inspect support, identify missing sources, and keep attorney review visible before work product is used.
Cite-checking and source-status language stay visible on generated work.
Unsupported or missing-source claims are flagged for attorney review.
Attorney review remains required before work product leaves the firm.
AI-generated - verify independently.
Security review
Review the details before your firm uploads case materials.
For firm pilots, LitiGenie can walk through the current security posture and data-handling terms so your team understands how the product fits your practice.
Security review is practical, not performative.
We keep public claims plain and review the details directly with firms, including data handling, AI provider terms, retention expectations, and attorney-controlled use of generated work.
Need to review security before a pilot?
We can walk through data handling, verification, attorney review, and current controls before your firm uploads real case materials.